Facilitator: Neil Rambo
Recorder: Beth Hill
Additional Participants:
Topics Discussed and Ideas Shared:
Definitions of Health Literacy
Challenges in the Assessment of Health Literacy
Ideas and Questions
Facilitator: Jan LaBeause
Recorder: Brenda R. Pfannenstiel
Additional Participants:
The participants introduced themselves and described their interests in health literacy, shared experiences they had had personally and professionally with health information literacy issues, shared recommendations and resources, and discussed projects they would like to undertake to improve health information literacy.
NM: has a grant to develop a website for consumer heaith information on diseases most common in her state.
HH: works on Baltimore AIDS Information Outreach Program.
EL: wants to work with nursing and allied heaith students at Columbia University to teach them how to evaluate literacy of patients and how to help them.
BW: works in NNLM Region 2, would like to develop a class to help people write and rewrite patient education/consumer health information.
JL: personal interest in helping elderly parents find appropriate materials for their education level, and professional interest as director of GAIN program working with librarian and nonlibrarian maembers in providing health information.
HS: NNLM-Pacific SW consumer health librarian (and RN) is interested in health literacy for consumers.
BP: would like to develop a three-tiered website (basic level, more details, technical level) conceming inheritance, environmental toxins, drug/alcohol exposure, etc. answering question "why does my child have cancer/autism/birth defects, etc." This would have to address health information literacy issues such as understanding the concept of "relative risk" or "autosomal dominance."
Discussion points made:
Medicare requires that information be written for patients at a 5th grade reading level. Easy reading material identified on MEDLINEpIus and NIH sites varies in reading level; if all the material is written at a 12th grade reading level except for one file written at a 9th grade reading level, that file becomes the "Easy Reading" file.
Computer filters may remove graphics on some subjects (e.g., effects of Viagra) or remove common language for body parts or diseases. Noted the importance of using graphics or common names for communication about diseases or body parts or risk behaviors (e.g., gonorrheal"the clap").
Also important to use dolls and other visual/tactile models to communicate health information. It would be helpful to assess the patienrs preferred leaming method to effectively communicate health information.
Physicians need to leam how to talk to patients; don't just announce the diagnosis and walk out They should be prepared to repeat the information several times, as patients don't hear/absorb it all the first time, especially if the information comes with an emotional burden. Patients will parrot back to the physicians what the physicians say without admitting that they don't understand the information. Some cultures are deferential toward doctors and are unlikely to question or ask for clarification.
Noted that one can't tell by looking if the patient is literate, and some patients read well but have poor number literacy (innumeracy?). Recalled the ER (TV series) episode in which a patient given a drug with written instructions to take once a day, interpreted these instructions as eleven times a day because "once" is Spanish for eleven.
Story recalled of a woman who put pills in her pill diary-put all her heart medications in the Monday slots, all her bladder medications on another day. It was assumed that the woman understood how to use her pill diary to keep her complicated drug regimen straight, but she was hospitalized due to this mistaken assumption. Never assume that someone understands.
Story recalled of mentally retarded man who confused schedule for his two drugs (one 3X a day with meals, one IX a day) and was hospitalized with toxic dose. Doctors attached a pictogram label to his drug refills, but were frustrated that there was no way to ensure that similar labelling would be used on his next refills, because the system didn't allow for it.
Noted the need to raise awareness about these heaith information literacy issues. Need for a clearinghouse for low literacylheaith information literacy resources, where materials can be pooled and shared.
Discussed resources such as PlainLanguage.gov and Peggy D'Amato's listserve conceming minority, high-risk, immigrant populations.
Suggested that there may be opportunities to collaborate with public librarians.